When it comes to ABA services, the intake assessment isn’t just a formality, it’s a clinical decision point that shapes everything to come. In this episode of In the Field: The ABA Podcast, host Allyson Wharam sits down with Dr. Kristen Byra, founder of Upskill ABA, to explore how we can elevate intake interviews through better training, smarter tools, and clinician-centered support systems.
Dr. Byra draws on nearly two decades in behavior analysis to share how decision models and clinical intelligence tools can support more consistent, effective, and person-centered assessments, especially during the critical intake process.
Key Topics Covered:
🔍 Why Intake Interviews Matter More Than We Realize
The intake assessment often sets the tone for the entire service experience. Kristen emphasizes that these interviews must go beyond checklists. They require keen clinical judgment, rapport-building, and the ability to translate caregiver input into meaningful, socially valid goals.
🧠 What Is a Clinical Decision Model?
Unlike a binary decision tree, a clinical decision model considers multiple variables—contextual factors, caregiver input, setting needs—to guide clinicians toward informed and individualized decisions. It supports, rather than replaces, clinical judgment.
📊 Using Decision Models to Train and Support Clinicians
New and experienced BCBAs alike can benefit from decision models. For newer clinicians, these tools build foundational interviewing and assessment skills. For experienced ones, they serve as a safety net to ensure nothing important is missed—like safety concerns, trauma history, or caregiver priorities.
🤝 Rapport, Trust, and Social Validity
Kristen highlights how trust-building during intake directly impacts data accuracy and goal prioritization. Parents are more likely to share honest, sensitive information when they feel respected and understood. Clinicians must be transparent, trauma-informed, and culturally responsive in how they collect information.
🛠️ From Assessment to Action: Making Data Useful
Too often, valuable intake information is collected and forgotten. Kristen’s models help bridge this gap by automatically generating usable documentation—reducing redundancy and improving care continuity. If you ask a question, she argues, it must lead to action.
⚖️ Balancing Standardization and Flexibility
Standardized tools help maintain quality across teams and reduce training burdens, but they must still allow for individualization. Kristen’s tools are designed to be adaptive. Clinicians can skip, revisit, or expand based on the specific needs of the family and their own experience level.
Key Takeaways:
-
Standardized intake tools can improve quality without sacrificing clinician autonomy.
-
Decision models support—not replace—clinical thinking and ensure assessments lead to action.
-
Prioritizing caregiver input is essential for social validity and long-term goal adherence.
-
Training tools embedded in clinical processes help new BCBAs build skills faster.
-
System-level improvements, like automated documentation and outcome tracking, support both quality and efficiency.
Learn More from Dr. Kristen Byra
If you're looking to streamline and elevate your intake assessments, you can get involved in the beta version of Dr. Byra’s intake assessment decision model. It’s free and designed for working clinicians.
👉 Connect with Kristen:
Subscribe to the Podcast
In the Field: The ABA Podcast brings you real conversations with leaders in behavior analysis. Subscribe to hear more insights, tools, and strategies that improve training, supervision, and clinical care.
🎧 Visit Sidekick Learning for free tools, supervision resources, and CEUs to support quality in ABA.
